home | north bay bohemian index | features | north bay | feature story
Get Out: When?
Late last year, 'Mother Jones' magazine asked more than 50 policy and military experts their opinions and predictions on when the United States could—and should—start withdrawing from Iraq. We reprint with permission their responses.
Sooner the Better
"From the standpoint of all the American interests involved, getting out sooner and more quickly is better than getting out slower and less quickly. There will be more killing as we leave, and that will be true whenever we leave. And there will not necessarily be less killing by leaving later rather than sooner."
—Paul Pillar, former top CIA official
"I think the quicker we get out militarily, the better. I've suggested a six-month withdrawal period." —George McGovern,
co-author, 'Out of Iraq'
"I would start tonight, because the fact is that this extraordinary experiment by Gen. Petraeus of converting the Army and Marine Corps into the Mesopotamian constabulary has failed." —Edward Luttwak, Center for Strategic and International Studies
"[Being out by March 1, 2008] allows us enough time to safely redeploy our troops and to hand over power to the Iraqis on the ground." —Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.
"Withdrawal will start in a limited sense next spring, simply because that is the end point at which the surge can no longer be sustained at its present level." —David Isenberg, British American Security Information Council
"[Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. Peter Pace's thinking that we can basically pull out a brigade a month—that's clearly bullshit. You could have everyone out in a relatively orderly way in six months."
—Andrew Bacevich, author, 'The New American Militarism'
"The generals who seem to be dragging their feet will argue 18 months to two years. Frankly, I think that if you made the decision to completely withdraw and you made some prudent choices with regard to the equipment you're retaining and shipping back, you certainly could be completely out within 12 months at the most. What I am worried about is that we will not make the decision to leave. We will postpone the inevitable requirement to get out to the point where we are swimming in a sea of constant hostility, and then we will make a lot of bad decisions."
—Col. Douglas MacGregor, (retired),
"I honestly don't foresee a major flight from Iraq between now and next November. But the Army cannot sustain this level of commitment without really straining it to the breaking point." —Col. Gary Anderson (USMC, retired), Pentagon consultant
Just Say When
"Delaying getting out for two years is actually more dangerous, whereas if you announce that you're getting out, you dominate the battle space, just like you did going in. If you want to see the Iraqis shape up, tell them you will leave in a year, and then the ball is really going to be in their court."
—Lawrence Korb, Center for American Progress
"Don't forget that the Iraqi Parliament has actually passed a resolution requesting that a date be set for the end of the occupation."
—Zbigniew Brzezinkski, former national security adviser
"The cutting-edge question is not whether we leave in four months versus 12. You begin to get the benefits and begin to alter the environment inside of Iraq as soon as you say, 'We're leaving within this short timeline.'"
—Carl Conetta, Project on Defense Alternatives
San Francisco.com Real Estate
Moving to the Bay Area just became easy. Let San Francisco.com show you all the homes currently for sale.
San Jose.com Real Estate
Relocating to San Jose or Silicon Valley? Let San Jose.com introduce you to some expert area real estate agents.
Stay the Course
"Will [the current] strategy prove adequate to this very complex, daunting and difficult task? I believe that certainly it does have a very strong chance of succeeding if we possess the will to see it through."
—Col. H. R. McMaster, adviser to Gen. David Petraeus
"I believe it will be in the interests of the United States to ensure security and stability in Iraq for a very long time." —Lt. Col. John Nagl, collaborator with Gen. David Petraeus on the Army counterinsurgency field manual
"I don't think [staying in] is as impossible as people think it would be, because we've already seen the Iraq narratives begin to swing back in a positive direction." —Thomas Donnelly, American Enterprise Institute
"I heard that some of the neocons were saying that if we were willing to suffer these kinds of casualty rates for about 10 years we could prevail. Well, give me a break. That just is not sustainable. And it's not victory in the end." —Gen. Anthony Zinni, former CentCom commander
"The one thing we've always forgotten is that the enemy always has a vote. It can really screw up a lot of things that you initially had planned." —Maj. Daniel Morgan,
School of Advanced Military Studies
Open Mic is now a weekly feature in the Bohemian. We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 700 words considered for publication, write [ mailto:[email protected] ][email protected]
Send a letter to the editor about this story.